Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of studies included in the base editing database with selected metrics

From: Be-dataHIVE: a base editing database

References

Guides

Targets

Avg. efficiency rates full guide

Avg. bystander outcome rate

Avg. bystander edit rate

Cell lines

Base editors

Editor types

Arbab et al. (2020) [6]

33,280

33,612

0.291

0.703

0.054

HEK293T, U2OS, mES

ABE, ABE-CP1040, AID, BE4, BE4-CP1028, CDA, H47ES48A, T31A, T31AT44A, T44DS45A, eA3A, evoAPOBEC

ABE, CBE

Pallaseni et al. (2022) [3]

26,339

26,335

0.137

0.707

0.466

HEK293T, K562

ABE20m, ABE8e, ABERA, BE4-1, BE4-2, FNLS

ABE, CBE

Marquart et al. (2021) [9]

22,289

22,289

0.201

0.903

0.010

HEK293T

ABE8e, ABEmax, CBE4max, Target-AID

ABE, CBE

Yuan et al. (2021) [8]

13,660

13,660

–

0.356

0.014

HEK293T

A3G-CGBE, A3G-CTD-CGBE, BE3-WT, CBE4max, YE1-FNLS-BE3, YE1-FNLS-CGBE, eA3A-FNLS-CGBE, elegan-A3G-CTD-OPTI-CGBE, elegan-A3G-OPTI-CGBE, elegan-eA3A-OPTI-CGBE, elgan-OPTI-CGBE

CBE

Song et al. (2020) [7]

12,210

12,210

0.141

0.960

0.007

HEK293T

ABE, CBE

ABE, CBE

  1. Please note that for some base editors certain metrics cannot be computed based on the underlying data and are therefore shown as –. For example, efficiency rates cannot be calculated based on bystander data alone as one could have multiple edits occurring at different positions within the same read (for a more detailed explanation please see Sect. "Base editing prediction tasks")