Table 8 Performance comparison between iPromoter-2L, iPromoter-BnCNN, PredPromoter-MF(2L) and iProL on the independent test dataset (TP/FP)
From: iProL: identifying DNA promoters from sequence information based on Longformer pre-trained model
Predictor | \({\sigma }^{24}\) | \({\sigma }^{28}\) | \({\sigma }^{32}\) | \({\sigma }^{38}\) | \({\sigma }^{54}\) | \({\sigma }^{70}\) | \({\sigma }^{unknown}\) | All |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
iPromoter-2L | 25/10 | 5/0 | 27/2 | 93/1 | 2/3 | 152/16 | 42/17 | 346/49 |
iPromoter-BnCNN | 30/5 | 5/0 | 26/3 | 91/3 | 2/3 | 156/12 | 50/9 | 360/35 |
PredPromoter-MF(2L) | 31/4 | 5/0 | 26/3 | 86/8 | 3/2 | 159/9 | 50/8 | 361/34 |
iProL (ours) | 30/5 | 5/0 | 26/3 | 91/3 | 4/1 | 159/9 | 52/7 | 367/28 |